A better understanding of scarring
wounds, wound care, Australia, professional, healthcare, expert, dressings, bandages, trauma, skin.
22635
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-22635,single-format-standard,theme-stockholm,qode-social-login-1.1.3,stockholm-core-2.3.2,woocommerce-no-js,select-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,select-theme-ver-9.10,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_menu_,qode-single-product-thumbs-below,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
Title Image

A better understanding of scarring

A better understanding of scarring

Nast and colleagues recently wrote about how silicone products can improve a scar’s presentation, along with reducing the risk of hypertrophic scar formation or helping accelerate its resolution. This of course has relevance for those individuals with a predisposition to abnormal scarring such as those : of a young age (< 30yrs); experiencing hormonal peaks (puberty and pregnancy); with a genetic tendency; with a wound under high skin tension and/or infection; an inflammatory condition and delayed wound healing. The authors postulate that the greatest risk for hypertrophic scarring arises from delayed epithelialisation. Even when a wound is closed, the epidermis continues to play a role in inciting inflammation until such time as the stratum corneum water barrier is intact and functional. Nast et al states that … “after wound closure, water still evaporates more rapidly through scar tissue and may take over a year to return to pre-wound (water-loss) levels.” A dehydrated stratum corneum prolongs the inflammatory process and provides stimulus for hypertrophic scar development. Occlusive silicone products are barriers to transepidermal water loss. Maintaining the skin in a hydrated state has been demonstrated to reduce inflammation and excess collagen deposition, allowing scars to progress through healing with a more normal physiological outcome.

Nast,A  Carreras,M  Thompson,AR  Edwards,J  Yutshovskaya,Y  Scar management: using silicone-based products in primary health care. Wounds Int 2016;7(4):23-27.